Excellent source of boredom |
A couple of
weeks ago we left Palm Springs after staying there for a month and a half. We
really enjoyed our time in the desert, with the fantastic San Jacinto mountains
looming 10,000 feet over our heads, the almost omnipresent beautiful weather,
the stunning cactus and desert scenery, the golf and some beautiful modernist
architecture in a ton of residential homes.
From that,
you’d think that I loved Palm Springs. But that would be a slight
misapprehension. Greater Palm Springs is an area that has nearly half a million
residents. Palm Springs, the town, has a mere 40,000 or so. And whilst we
enjoyed being in Palm Springs city, and whilst we loved being in the desert,
the greater metropolitan area is dreary.
It holds so
much promise: 125 golf courses (but they all look the same, have nothing to do
with the desert, and cost a fortune). The newer, shinier, more recently built
houses – but if you thought they’d carry on with the cool modernist aesthetic, you’d
be mistaken; instead they’ve just plonked down McMansions or miserable
retirement communities on the golf courses without the slightest thought for
how it might look. There are a ton of restaurants, except they’re all chains,
or bad steak houses. It’s just a whole lot of nothing. There’s no “there”
there.
Which
brings me, as a tenuous link, to Post’s Honeycomb. Kerry visited us in Palm
Springs and generously bought a couple of packs of cereal for me. This is the
first, and I was excited. You’d think an American breaksfast cereal called “honeycomb”
would be awesome: sweet, crunchy and wonderful. Perhaps like a delightfully
bad-taste version of a Crunchy.
Sadly not. It
is the cereal equivalent of greater Palm Springs. It is deeply underwhelming. It
has no character. No excitement.
A bowl of Meh |
The cereal
itself is hugely puffed up, and massively inflated (the only cereal so far
where a portion is a cup and a half, because so much of it is air). It’s shaped
more like cartoon snowflake than honeycomb. This gigantism is actually really
annoying, as it’s hard to shovel it into the mouth fast enough. And you get
very little of any note with any bite.
The texture
is OKish, but no better. It’s crunchy, which is good. But it’s not that nice,
biting crunch. It’s a bit soft and airy. It’s not quite like eating Styrofoam peanuts,
but it’s not far off. If you go halfway between a Styrofoam peanut and some
stale toast, you’re probably on the right tracks.
The flavour
too is sort of OK. But that’s as good as I could say. It wasn’t offensive, but
it was very mild. Although there was honey, there wasn’t very much of it. Although
there was cereal, there wasn’t much. Mostly there was little flavour at all,
and at the base it was that bland, cardboard taste that seems to be the root of
some of the worst cereals here.
As I
mentioned already, it’s the cereal equivalent of Rancho Mirage or Indian Wells.
You think it all sounds good, the component parts all look great, but it is so much less than the sum of its
parts, just leaving you bored and disappointed.
You successfully summed up my impression of what I consider the worst cereal out there....and Elycia LOVES the stuff. It's pretty much the only cereal she'll eat. Not sure what that says about her choosing me ;-)
ReplyDeleteI am just now finally reading your latest entries. (what can i say, March was busy) This one was very good. I think its funny that the pattern of honeycomb is similar to those ornate concrete barrier walls we saw all over palm springs. anyways, well written my little honey-comb kid. (you probably don't know that jingle either, but if kerry was here with me wed be singing 'honey comb kids yeah yeah yeah, it's not something no no no' i am sure we can find it on youtube)
ReplyDelete